If] one consecrated his possessions, and among them were things suitable for communal offerings, these [things] should be given to the artisans for their wages —- [these are] the words of R’ Akiva.  Said Ben Azzai to him: This is not the [same] method [described above]. Rather, they set aside from these [things an amount equal to] the artisans’ wages and redeem them with [funds set aside] for the artisans’ wages; then they give them to the artisans as their wages and repur-chase them with [funds from] the new terumah.

[If] one consecrated his possessions, and among them there was an animal suitable for the altar, either male or female —- R’ Eliezer says: The males should be sold to those needing burnt-offerings and the females should be sold to those needing peace-offerings; their proceeds should be used with the rest of the property for the upkeep of the Temple.  R’ Ye-hoshua says: The males themselves should be brought as burnt-offerings, but the females should be sold to those needing peace-offerings, burnt-offerings should be brought with their proceeds, and the rest of the property should be used for the upkeep of the Temple.  R’ Akiva says: I prefer R’ Eliezer’s view over R’ Yehoshua’s, because R’ Eliezer applies his [logi-cal] method uniformly whereas R’ Yehoshua differentiates.  Said R’ Papyas: I have been taught that both views are correct. Regarding one who consecrates explicitly, [the halachah is] according to R’ Eliezer; whereas regarding one who consecrates without explicit designation, [the halachah is] according to R’ Yehoshua.