[In] which [ways] is [the androgyne] not equal to men nor to women? They are not liable due to his tumah, they do not burn [terumah] on his tumah, and he cannot be the subject of an erech vow, not like men and not like women; he cannot be sold as a Hebrew slave, neither like men nor like women; and if [one] says, “I am a nazir that this [androgyne] is not a man and a not a woman,” he is a nazir.  R' Yose says: An androgyne is a creature unto it- self and the Sages could not decide whether he is a man or a woman. But a tumtum is not so; rather, he is possibly a man and possibly a woman.

The [types of] transfers on the Sabbath are two which are [in reality] four within, and two which are [in reality] four outside. How is this so? The poor man is standing outside and the householder inside: If the poor man extended his hand inside and placed [an object] into the householder’s hand, or if he took [an object] from it and brought [that object] out — the poor man is liable and the householder is exempt; if the householder extended his hand outside and placed [an object] into the poor man’s hand, or if he took [an object] out of it and brought [that object] in — the householder is liable and the poor man is exempt; if the poor man extended his hand inside and the householder took [an object] from it, or placed [an object] into it and he [the poor man] brought [that object] out — both are exempt; if the householder extended his hand outside and the poor man took [an object] from it, or placed [an object] into it and he [the householder] brought [that object] in — both are exempt.