[Regarding] partners who designated terumah one after the other, R' Akiva says: Both their “terumos” are terumah. But the Sages say: The terumah of the first is terumah. R' Yose says: If the first [partner] separated an [appropriate] amount of te-rumah, the terumah of the second [partner] is not terumah; but if the first [partner] did not separate an [appropriate] amount of terumah, the terumah of the second [partner] is terumah.

[If] one of [these two “terumos”] fell into chullin, it does not render [the chullin] forbidden. [If] the second one fell into a dif-ferent place, it does not render [that chullin] forbidden. [If] both [“terumos”] fell into one place, they render the mixture for-bidden according to [the size of] the smaller of the two.