Terumah nullifies orlah, and orlah nullifies terumah. How so? A seah of terumah fell into one hundred, and subsequently three kabin of orlah, or three kabin of kilei hakerem fell in, this is where terumah nullifies orlah, and orlah nullifies terumah.

Orlah nullifies kilayim, and kilayim [nullifies] orlah, and orlah [nullifies] orlah. How so? A seah of orlah fell into two hundred, and subsequently a seah and a bit more of orlah, or a seah and a bit more of kilei hakerem fell in, this is where orlah nullifies kilayim, and kilayim [nullifies] orlah, and orlah [nullifies] orlah.

Any [agent] that leavens, spices, or generates a prohibited mixture of chullin and terumah, if it is of terumah, orlah, or kilei hakerem, is forbidden. And Beis Shammai say: It even imparts tumah. But Beis Hillel say: It never imparts tumah unless it is like [the volume of] an egg.

Dostay of the village of Yasma was of the students of Beis Shammai, and [he] said: I heard from Shammai the Elder that it never conveys tumah until it is like [the volume of an] egg.

And in what [case] did they say: “Any [agent] that leavens, spices, or generates a prohibited mixture of chullin and terumah is to be treated with stringency”? A type in a like type. To be treated [sometimes] leniently and [sometimes] stringently? A type in an unlike type. How so? Sourdough of wheat that fell into a dough of wheat, and there is enough of it to leaven, whether there is enough to nullify in one hundred and one and whether there is not enough to nullify in one hundred and one, it is forbidden. [If] there is not enough to nullify in one hundred and one, whether there is enough of it to leaven or whether there is not enough of it to leaven, it is forbidden.

“To be treated [sometimes] leniently and [sometimes] stringently? A type in an unlike type.” How so? For example, where pounded [beans] were cooked with lentils, and they had the capacity to impart flavor, whether they were capable of being nullified in one hundred and one, or whether they were not capable of being nullified in one hundred and one, it is prohibited. If they did not have the capacity to impart flavor, whether they were capable of being nullified in one hundred and one, or whether they were not capable of being nullified in one hundred and one, it is permitted.

Sourdough of chullin that fell into a dough, and it is capable of leavening [the dough], and afterwards sourdough of terumah or sourdough of kilei hakerem fell in, and it is capable of leavening, it is prohibited.

Sourdough of chullin that fell into a dough and leavened it, and afterwards there fell in sourdough of terumah or sourdough of kilei hakerem, and it is capable of leavening [the dough], it is forbidden. R' Shimon permits.

Seasonings of two or three names of one type, or of three, are forbidden and com-bine. R' Shimon says: Two or three names of one type or two types of one name do not combine.

Sourdough of chullin and of terumah that fell into a dough, [and] there was not in this one sufficient to leaven and there was not in this one sufficient to leaven, [but] they combined and leavened, R' Eliezer says: “We follow the last one.” But the Sages say: Whether the prohibition fell in the beginning or at the end, it never forbids until in it there is sufficient to leaven.

Yoezer, a man of the Birah, was of the students of Beis Shammai, and he said: I asked Rabban Gamliel the Elder while standing at the East Gate, and he said, “It never forbids unless there is enough of it to leaven.”

Vessels that one lubricated with tamei oil and then went back and lubricated them [again] with tahor oil, or that he lubricated with tahor oil and then went back and lubricated them [again] with tamei oil, R' Eliezer says: “After the first one I come.” But the Sages say: After the last one.essels that one lubricated with tamei oil and then went back and lubricated them [again] with tahor oil, or that he lubricated with tahor oil and then went back and lubricated them [again] with tamei oil, R' Eliezer says: “After the first one I come.” But the Sages say: After the last one.

Sourdough of terumah and of kilei hakerem that fell into a dough, [and] there was not in this one sufficient to leaven and there was not in this one sufficient to leaven, [but] they combined and leavened, it is prohibited to non-Kohanim, and permitted to Kohanim. R' Shimon permits [it] to non-Kohanim and to Kohanim.

Seasonings of terumah and of kilei hakerem that fell into a pot, [and] there was not in these sufficient to season and there was not in these sufficient to season, but they combined and seasoned, it is prohibited to non-Kohanim, but permitted to Kohanim. R' Shimon permits [it] to non-Kohanim and to Kohanim.

Cut[s] of kodshei kodashim, of piggul and of nossar that were cooked with the [other] cuts, it is forbidden to non-Kohanim and permitted to Kohanim. R' Shimon permits to non-Kohanim and to Kohanim.

Meat of kodshei kodashim and meat of kodashim kalim that were cooked with meat of the appetite, [it] is forbidden for a tamei person but permitted for a tahor person.

A garment that was dyed with orlah shells must be burned. [If] it was mixed with others, they are all to be burned. [These are] the words of R' Meir. But the Sages say: It is nullified in two hundred and one.

Someone who dyes a syt's length [of thread] with orlah shells, and weaves it into a garment, but it is not known which one it is, R' Meir says: The garment must be burned. But the Sages say: It is nullified in two hundred and one.