Playback Rate
Temurah 3:4
Temurah3: 4
וַהֲלֹא אַף הַנְּדָבָה עוֹלָה הִיא, מַה בֵּין דִּבְרֵי רַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר לְדִבְרֵי חֲכָמִים? אֶלָּא, בִּזְמַן שֶׁהִיא בָאָה חוֹבָה — הוּא סוֹמֵךְ עָלֶיהָ, וּמֵבִיא עָלֶיהָ נְסָכִין, וּנְסָכֶיהָ מִשֶּׁלּוֹ. וְאִם הָיָה כֹהֵן — עֲבוֹדָתָהּ וְעוֹרָהּ שֶׁלּוֹ. וּבִזְמַן שֶׁהִיא בָאָה נְדָבָה — אֵינוֹ סוֹמֵךְ עָלֶיהָ, וְאֵינוֹ מֵבִיא עָלֶיהָ נְסָכִין, וּנְסָכֶיהָ מִשֶּׁל צִבּוּר. אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁהוּא כֹהֵן — עֲבוֹדָתָהּ וְעוֹרָהּ שֶׁל אַנְשֵׁי מִשְׁמָר.
But is not the voluntary [communal] offering also an olah, so what is the difference between the words of R’ Elazar and the words of the Sages? Rather, when [an animal] comes as an obligatory offering, [the owner] must lean on it and bring wine libations, and its libations are bought from his [funds]. And if [the owner] was a Kohen, the [right to perform] its service and its hide belong to him. But when it is a voluntary [communal] offering, [the owner] does not lean on it and does not bring libations for it; but [rather] and its libations are bought from communal funds. [And] even if [the owner] is a Kohen, [the right to perform] its service and its hide belong to the members of the mishmar.
Suggestions

