R’ Shimon Shizuri and R’ Shimon say: They did not disagree that concerning anything of one category he is liable. Concerning what do they differ? Concerning something of two categories, that R’ Eliezer holds [him] liable to a chatas, and R’ Yehoshua exempts [him]. Said R’ Yehudah: Even if he intended to pick figs and he picked grapes, [to pick] grapes and he picked figs, [to pick] black ones and he picked white ones, [or to pick] white ones and he picked black ones, R’ Eliezer holds [him] liable to a chatas, and R’ Yehoshua exempts [him]. [But] said R’ Yehudah: I am amazed that R’ Yehoshua exempts [him] in this case. If so, why is it stated (Lev. 4:23): In which he sinned? This is to exclude an unwitting act.

Slaughter-blood of cattle, of beasts, or of fowl, whether unclean or clean; blood [shed as a result] of piercing; or blood [shed as a result] of tearing; or the blood of bloodletting, by which life escapes — they are liable for it. The blood of the spleen; the blood of the heart; the blood of eggs; the blood of fish; the blood of locusts; or the blood that oozes out — they are not liable for it. R’ Yehudah holds [one] liable for the blood that oozes out.