Playback Rate
Kerisus4: 3
רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן שְׁזוּרִי וְרַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן אוֹמְרִים: לֹא נֶחֶלְקוּ עַל־דָּבָר שֶׁהוּא מִשּׁוּם שֵׁם אֶחָד, שֶׁהוּא חַיָּב. וְעַל־מַה־נֶחֶלְקוּ? עַל־דָּבָר שֶׁהוּא מִשּׁוּם שְׁנֵי שֵׁמוֹת, שֶׁרַבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר מְחַיֵּב חַטָּאת, וְרַבִּי יְהוֹשֻׁעַ פּוֹטֵר. אָמַר רַבִּי יְהוּדָה: אֲפִלּוּ נִתְכַּוֵּן לְלַקֵּט תְּאֵנִים וְלִקֵּט עֲנָבִים, עֲנָבִים וְלִקֵּט תְּאֵנִים, שְׁחוֹרוֹת וְלִקֵּט לְבָנוֹת, לְבָנוֹת וְלִקֵּט שְׁחוֹרוֹת, רַבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר מְחַיֵּב חַטָּאת, וְרַבִּי יְהוֹשֻׁעַ פּוֹטֵר. אָמַר רַבִּי יְהוּדָה: תָּמֵהַּ אֲנִי אִם יִפְטֹר בָּהּ רַבִּי יְהוֹשֻׁעַ. אִם כֵּן, לָמָּה נֶאֱמַר: ,,אֲשֶׁר חָטָא בָּהּ?“ פְּרָט לַמִּתְעַסֵּק.
R’ Shimon Shizuri and R’ Shimon say: They did not disagree that concerning anything of one category he is liable. Concerning what do they differ? Concerning something of two categories, that R’ Eliezer holds [him] liable to a chatas, and R’ Yehoshua exempts [him]. Said R’ Yehudah: Even if he intended to pick figs and he picked grapes, [to pick] grapes and he picked figs, [to pick] black ones and he picked white ones, [or to pick] white ones and he picked black ones, R’ Eliezer holds [him] liable to a chatas, and R’ Yehoshua exempts [him]. [But] said R’ Yehudah: I am amazed that R’ Yehoshua exempts [him] in this case. If so, why is it stated (Lev. 4:23): In which he sinned? This is to exclude an unwitting act.
Suggestions

