[If] one performed melikah on a bird within [the Temple] and offered [it] up outside, he is liable; [but if] one performed melikah [on it] outside [the Temple] and offered [it] up outside, he is not liable. [If] one slaughtered a bird [offering] within [the Temple] and offered [it] up outside, he is not liable; [but if] he slaughtered [it] outside [the Temple] and offered [it] up outside, he is liable. It follows that the method which renders it fit within [the Temple] exempts it from liability outside [it]; [and] the method which renders it fit outside [the Temple] exempts it within. R’ Shimon says: Anything which renders one liable when [performed] outside also renders one liable when its counterpart was [performed] within and [the parts were later] offered up outside — except for one who slaughters within and offers up outside.