[For] an animal that has committed an act of bestiality, or an animal on which an act of bestiality has been performed, or an [animal] designated [for idolatrous sacrifice], or which has been worshiped, or a [harlot’s] payment, or a [dog’s] exchange, or a mixed breed, or a tereifah, or an animal born by Caesarian section — which one offered up outside [the Temple] — one is not liable; as it says (Lev. 17:4): before the Tabernacle of Hashem — whatever is not fit [to be brought] before the Tabernacle of Hashem, one is not liable on its account. [For] blemished animals — whether those with permanent blemishes or those with passing blemishes — which one offered up outside, one is not liable. R’ Shimon says: [For] permanently blemished animals, one is not liable; but [for] animals with passing blemishes, one transgresses a negative commandment. Turtledoves whose time has not yet arrived, and young pigeons whose time has passed — [if] one offered them up outside, he is not liable. R’ Shimon says: [For] young pigeons whose time has passed, one is not liable; [but for] turtledoves whose time has not [yet] arrived, [one transgresses] a negative commandment. [For] an animal and its offspring, and a premature [offering], one is not liable. R’ Shimon says: This comes under [the ban of] a negative commandment; for R’ Shimon would say: Whatever is fit to be brought later is under the ban of a negative commandment, but it bears no kares [penalty]. But the Sages say: For whatever there is no kares [penalty], there is [also] no negative commandment.