In what manner is the part which makes it permissible [considered to have been] offered as required? [If] he slaughtered in silence, [but] received [the blood], conveyed, and threw [it, for] beyond its time; or he slaughtered [it, for] beyond its time, [but] received [the blood], conveyed, and threw [it], in silence; or he slaughtered, received [the blood], conveyed, and threw [it, for] beyond its time — this is [a case] in which the part which makes it permissible has been offered as required. In what manner is the part which makes it permissible not [considered to have been] offered as required? [If] he slaughtered [with intent for] outside its area, [but] received [the blood], conveyed, and threw [it, for] beyond its time; or he slaughtered [with intent for] beyond its time, [but] received [the blood], conveyed, and threw [it, for] outside its area; or he slaughtered, received [the blood], conveyed, [or] threw [it, for] outside its area; [or] a pesach- or chatas-offering which he slaughtered for a designation other than its own, and received [the blood], conveyed, and threw [it, for] beyond its time; or he slaughtered [with intent for] beyond its time, [but] received [the blood], conveyed, and threw [it, for] a designation other than its own; or he slaughtered, received [the blood], conveyed, [or] threw [it, for] a designation other than its own — this is [a case] in which the part which makes it permissible was not offered as required.

[If he intended] to eat an olive’s volume [of the offering] outside and an olive’s volume tomorrow, [or] an olive’s volume tomorrow and an olive’s volume outside, [or if he intended to eat] half an olive’s volume outside [its area] and half an olive’s volume tomorrow, [or] half an olive’s volume tomorrow and half an olive’s volume outside [its area] — it is invalid, but it bears no kares [punishment]. Said R’ Yehudah: This is the rule: If the intent of time preceded the intent of place, [it is] piggul, and one is liable to kares for it; but if the intent of place preceded the intent of time it is invalid, but bears no kares [punishment]. But the Sages say: In either case it is invalid, but bears no kares [punishment]. [If one intended] to eat half an olive’s volume and to burn upon the Altar half an olive’s volume, it is valid — because eating and Altar-burning are not combined.