. A sapling of orlah, or of kilayim of the vineyard, that became mixed up with [other] saplings, this he may not gather. But if he did gather, it is nullified in two hundred and one, provided that he does not intend to gather. R' Yose says: He may even gather intentionally, and it will be nullified in two hundred and one.

The leaves, the shoots, the water of vines, and the buds are permitted in orlah and in reva'i, and in [regard to] a nazir, but they are forbidden in an asheirah. R' Yose says: The buds are forbidden, because it is fruit. R' Eliezer says: [If] one curdles [milk] with sap of orlah, it is forbidden. Said R' Yehoshua: I have heard explicitly that [if] one curdles with sap of leaves, [or] with sap of roots, it is permitted; with the sap of unripe fruit, it is forbidden, because they are fruit.

Damaged grapes, grapepits, grapeskins, and their temed; the peels of a pomegranate and its blossom; nutshells, and pits are forbidden in regard to orlah, in [regard to] an asheirah, and in [regard to] a nazir, but are permitted in [regard to] reva'i. And unripe fruits that fall from a tree are all forbidden.

R' Yose says: A branch of orlah may be planted, but a nut of orlah may not be planted, because it is a fruit. And clusters containing date-buds of orlah may not be grafted.

Terumah, and terumas maaser of demai, challah, and bikkurim, are nullified in one hundred and one, and they combine with one another, and one must remove.  Orlah and kilei hakerem are nullified in two hundred and one, and they combine with one another, but one does not need to remove. R' Shimon says: They do not combine. R' Eliezer says: They combine to give flavor, but not to prohibit.

Terumah nullifies orlah, and orlah nullifies terumah. How so? A seah of terumah fell into one hundred, and subsequently three kabin of orlah, or three kabin of kilei hakerem fell in, this is where terumah nullifies orlah, and orlah nullifies terumah.

Orlah nullifies kilayim, and kilayim [nullifies] orlah, and orlah [nullifies] orlah. How so? A seah of orlah fell into two hundred, and subsequently a seah and a bit more of orlah, or a seah and a bit more of kilei hakerem fell in, this is where orlah nullifies kilayim, and kilayim [nullifies] orlah, and orlah [nullifies] orlah.

Any [agent] that leavens, spices, or generates a prohibited mixture of chullin and terumah, if it is of terumah, orlah, or kilei hakerem, is forbidden. And Beis Shammai say: It even imparts tumah. But Beis Hillel say: It never imparts tumah unless it is like [the volume of] an egg.

Dostay of the village of Yasma was of the students of Beis Shammai, and [he] said: I heard from Shammai the Elder that it never conveys tumah until it is like [the volume of an] egg.

And in what [case] did they say: “Any [agent] that leavens, spices, or generates a prohibited mixture of chullin and terumah is to be treated with stringency”? A type in a like type. To be treated [sometimes] leniently and [sometimes] stringently? A type in an unlike type. How so? Sourdough of wheat that fell into a dough of wheat, and there is enough of it to leaven, whether there is enough to nullify in one hundred and one and whether there is not enough to nullify in one hundred and one, it is forbidden. [If] there is not enough to nullify in one hundred and one, whether there is enough of it to leaven or whether there is not enough of it to leaven, it is forbidden.

“To be treated [sometimes] leniently and [sometimes] stringently? A type in an unlike type.” How so? For example, where pounded [beans] were cooked with lentils, and they had the capacity to impart flavor, whether they were capable of being nullified in one hundred and one, or whether they were not capable of being nullified in one hundred and one, it is prohibited. If they did not have the capacity to impart flavor, whether they were capable of being nullified in one hundred and one, or whether they were not capable of being nullified in one hundred and one, it is permitted.

Sourdough of chullin that fell into a dough, and it is capable of leavening [the dough], and afterwards sourdough of terumah or sourdough of kilei hakerem fell in, and it is capable of leavening, it is prohibited.

Sourdough of chullin that fell into a dough and leavened it, and afterwards there fell in sourdough of terumah or sourdough of kilei hakerem, and it is capable of leavening [the dough], it is forbidden. R' Shimon permits.

Seasonings of two or three names of one type, or of three, are forbidden and com-bine. R' Shimon says: Two or three names of one type or two types of one name do not combine.

Sourdough of chullin and of terumah that fell into a dough, [and] there was not in this one sufficient to leaven and there was not in this one sufficient to leaven, [but] they combined and leavened, R' Eliezer says: “We follow the last one.” But the Sages say: Whether the prohibition fell in the beginning or at the end, it never forbids until in it there is sufficient to leaven.

Yoezer, a man of the Birah, was of the students of Beis Shammai, and he said: I asked Rabban Gamliel the Elder while standing at the East Gate, and he said, “It never forbids unless there is enough of it to leaven.”