[If] a maiden was seduced, [the indemnities for] her disgrace and her impairment, as well as her fine, belong to her father, as well as the [indemnity for] pain in [the case of] a violated [maiden].  [If] she went to trial before the father died, they belong to the father; [if] the father died, they belong to the brothers; [if] the father died before she went to trial, they belong to her. [If] she went to trial before she matured, they belong to the father; [if] the father died, they belong to the brothers; [if] she matured before she went to trial, they belong to her. R’ Shimon says: If she did not collect [the payments] before the father died, they belong to her.  Her handiwork and anything she found, although she did not [yet] collect [it] —- [if] the father died, they belong to the brothers.

A female proselyte, whose daughter converted with her and [subsequently] committed adultery —- [the latter] is liable to strangling. Neither [the requirement to take her to] the door of the father’s house applies to her, nor the one hundred sela. [Even if] her conception had not been in holiness, but her birth [had been] in holiness, she is liable to stoning. Neither [the requirement to take her to] the door of the father’s house applies to her, nor the one hundred sela. [If both] her conception and her birth were in holiness, she is like a daughter of Israel in all respects.  [If] she has a father, but she has no door of the father’s house; [or if] she has a door of the father’s house, but she has no father, she is [nevertheless] liable to stoning; the door of her father’s house was intended only as a precept.