A female proselyte, whose daughter converted with her and [subsequently] committed adultery —- [the latter] is liable to strangling. Neither [the requirement to take her to] the door of the father’s house applies to her, nor the one hundred sela. [Even if] her conception had not been in holiness, but her birth [had been] in holiness, she is liable to stoning. Neither [the requirement to take her to] the door of the father’s house applies to her, nor the one hundred sela. [If both] her conception and her birth were in holiness, she is like a daughter of Israel in all respects.  [If] she has a father, but she has no door of the father’s house; [or if] she has a door of the father’s house, but she has no father, she is [nevertheless] liable to stoning; the door of her father’s house was intended only as a precept.