[Regarding] a sheretz and a frog in the public domain, [if] someone touched one of them and prepared tohoros and they were eaten, [and] he immersed, touched the second [object] and prepared tohoros, these [tohoros] are tahor. If the first [tohoros] are still extant, these and those are suspended. If he did not immerse in the interim, the first [tohoros] are suspended and the sec-ond [tohoros] should be burned.

[Regarding] two paths, one tamei and one tahor, [if] someone walked on one of them and prepared tohoros, and his friend came and walked on the second [path] and prepared tohoros, R’ Yehudah says: If each of them inquired separately, both are [ruled] tahor. [But] if both [people] inquired together, both are [ruled] tamei. R’ Yose says: Either way, both are [ruled] tamei.

[Regarding] two loaves, one tamei and one tahor, [if someone] ate one of them and pre-pared tohoros and his friend came and ate the second [loaf] and prepared tohoros, R’ Yehudah says: If each of them inquired separately, both are [ruled] tahor. But if both inquired together, both are [ruled] tamei. R’ Yose says: Either way, both are [ruled] tamei.

[Regarding] someone who was sitting in the public domain and one came and tread on his clothes, or spit and he touched his saliva, with regard to his saliva we burn terumah, but with regard to his clothes we follow the majority. [If] he was sleeping in the public domain and then awoke, his clothes are tamei as a midras; [these are] the words of R’ Meir. But the Sages rule [them] tahor.  [If] someone touched a person at night, and it is not known whether [that person] was alive or dead, and in the morning he arose and found him dead, R’ Meir rules [that he is] tahor. But the Sages rule [that he is] tamei, because all [uncer-tainties of] tumah are [decided] according to [their status at] the time of their discovery.