A chatas [bird] which mingled with a [number of] olah [birds] or an olah [bird which mingled] with a [number of] chatas [birds], even if one [such bird-offering mingled] with ten thousand [bird-offerings of the other type], they must all be left to die.  A chatas bird which mingled with an obligatory pair [of bird-offerings], there are none valid other than the number of chatas birds in the obligatory pair.  And likewise, an olah bird which mingled with an obligatory pair [of bird-offerings], there are none valid other than the number of olah-birds in the obligatory pair.  [These rules apply] whether the obligatory [bird-offerings] are more numerous and the voluntary [bird-offerings] are less numerous, [or] whether the voluntary [bird-offerings] are more numerous and the obligatory [bird offerings] are less numerous, [or] whether they are both equal [in number].

In what [case] are [these] words said? With obligatory pairs [of bird offerings] and voluntary [bird offerings which mingled together]. But with obligatory pairs [of bird offerings] which mingled with each other, one [pair] for this [woman] and one [pair] for that [woman], [or] two [pairs] for this [woman] and two [pairs] for that [woman], [or] three [pairs] for this [woman] and three [pairs] for that [woman], half [of the mingled birds] are valid [to be offered] and half [of the birds] are invalid [to be offered]. [If, however, there was] one [pair of obligatory bird offerings] for this [woman] and two [such pairs] for that [woman], or three [such pairs] for that [woman], or ten [such pairs] for that [woman], or a hundred [such pairs] for that [woman], the [amount of birds in the] smallest [group] is valid [to be offered], whether [they are brought for] the same obligation [or] whether [they are brought for] two [different] obligations, whether [they are brought] from one woman [or] whether [they are brought] from two [different] women.

What is the case of [the two groups of offerings being brought] for one [type of] obligation? [If the first group of offerings was brought for one incident of a woman giving] birth and [the other group or groups were also brought for incidents of giving] birth, [or if the first group of offerings was brought for one occurrence of] zivah and [the other group or groups were also brought for occurrences of] zivah, [these are cases of both groups being brought] for one [type of] obligation.  [And what is the case of the two groups of offerings being brought] for two [different types of] obligations? [If one group was brought for] a birth and [the other group was brought for occurrences of] zivah.  What is the case of [the two groups of offerings being brought from] two women? [If the two groups of birds were brought to atone] for this woman [upon giving] birth and [to atone] for that woman [upon giving] birth, [or if the two groups of birds were brought to atone] for this woman [for an occurrence of] zivah and [to atone] for that woman [for an occurrence of] zivah, [these are cases of the groups belonging to both women being brought] for one [type of] obligation.  [And what is the case of the groups of offerings for two women being brought] for two [different types of] obligations? [if one group of offerings was brought to atone] for this woman [upon giving] birth and [the other group of offerings was brought to atone] for that woman [upon an occurrence of] zivah.  R’ Yose says: Two women [who were obligated to bring bird-offerings] who took their pairs of birds [for their offerings] mixed together [without designating which particular birds would belong to which woman], or [if] they [together] gave the purchase money for their pairs of birds to the Kohen [who sells these birds, without designating which money belongs to whom], the Kohen may offer whichever [birds] he wishes as a chatas, and he may offer whichever [birds] he wishes as an olah, whether [they are both brought] for the same [type of] obligation [or] whether [they are each brought] for two different [types of] obligations.

An undesignated pair from which [one] bird flew [away, out] to the [open] air [of the world], or it flew to among [bird-offerings] which must be left to die, or if one of them died, he must take a partner for the second [bird].  [If] it flew to among others which are fit for offering, it is unfit, and it renders unfit one [bird] corresponding to itself; for a bird which flies [out of its pair and into other pairs] is unfit, and it renders unfit one [bird] corresponding to itself.