[If] one intended to say, “[This portion should be] terumah,” but said [instead, “It should be] maaser”; [or to say, “It should be] maaser,” but said [instead “It should be] terumah”; [or he intended to say, “This animal should be] an olah-offering,” but said [instead, “It should be] a shelamim-offering”; [or to say, “It should be] a shelamim offering,” but said [instead, “It should be] an olah-offering”; [or he intended to declare an oath] ”that I will not enter this house,” but said [instead, “I will not enter] this [other one] ”; [or to vow] ” that I will not derive benefit from this [person],” but said [instead, “I will not derive benefit] from this [other person]”; he has said nothing, until his words and thoughts are in accord.

A non-Jew and a Cuthean: their terumah is terumah, and their tithes are tithes, and their items of consecration are consecrat-ed. R' Yehudah says: A non-Jew does not have revai of vineyards. But the Sages say: He does have [revai of vineyards]. The terumah of a non-Jew creates a dimua mixture, and we are liable to an additional “fifth” for [eating] it. But R' Shimon exempts.

[If] one separates part of the terumah or tithes [due from a pile of produce], he may separate from [the pile] the [remaining] terumah for [this pile], but not for another place. R' Meir says: He may even separate terumah and tithes [from this pile] for another place.

One whose produce was in the storeroom, and he gave a seah to a Levi and a seah to a pauper, he may separate up to eight seahs and eat them. [These are] the words of R' Meir. But the Sages say: He separates only according to the amount [of one meal].